Sunday, February 17, 2008

"Are You Supposed to Wear That?," or, Out of the Mouths of Baristas

Yesterday, TheNinja and I rode to Princeton for what has become a pretty regular weekend ride: ride - coffee - ride. Typically, we stop at Small World Coffee, so I can increase my bougy academic cred by drinking way too expensive organic fair trade coffee and listening to world music (and the baristas are way cute).

As we were putting our bikes by the door and removing our helmets to go in, I spied a woman talking on her cell phone with a button that read, "African Americans for Hillary Clinton."

She was the typical bougy Princetonian: white.

I puzzled about this for a bit. Was this some sort of Princeton grad student irony? Does this woman feel the issues that affect the African-American community in a really deep way? Is it a little messed up that in a Democratic race that has come down to racial politics this woman is wearing an "African Americans for Hillary Clinton" button?

I stopped puzzling and went in to order coffee.

Whilst I was mulling over identity politics, racial politics, and their relationship to affinity, the woman had already gone in and was ordering.

TheNinja and I sat behind her in line and got treated to the most amazing exchange.

The very earnest barista took the woman's order and then, having seen the button, said, "Are you supposed to wear that?"

I both gasped in horror and had to bite my lip to keep from laughing.

The woman was clearly upset.

The barista, realizing that this probably wasn't the best thing to have said, tried to qualify, "I mean, don't people typically wear 'Women for Hillary Clinton' or whatever group they are a part of?"

The woman clearly understood herself as too smart for such a pedestrian claim and tersely responded, "No, I support African Americans and I support Hillary Clinton."

Her boyfriend had at this point appeared on the scene and tried to make light of the kind of tense situation in hopes of diffusing it.

They got their $5 coffee drinks and left quickly.

I ordered my coffee next and said to the now flustered barista, "I was kind of thinking the same thing."

She remarked with surprise about the woman's angry reaction.

I sat down with theNinja and talked biomechanics.

___

I sort of wonder about that exchange. On the one hand, I think it's pretty damn righteous to call out the bourgeois liberal on identifying/occupying a position that she may not be able to claim but does so anyway because, like listening to NPR and eating organic flax seeds, that's what you do when you're a bourgeois liberal.

At the same time, I'm uncomfortable with specifying who can identify with what group based on my assumptions about his or her identity. It's a little dangerous to start making claims about who can and cannot identify with what certain groups. Identity politics have their utility, but they tend toward the divisive and exclusionary by drawing lines and insisting on "authenticity" and "the real." In doing so, identity politics can obscure the powerful ways in which identity is not some essence of our being but rather discursively constituted.

How "real" do you have to be to wear that Hillary Clinton button? Honestly, I don't know.

8 comments:

Adam said...

Mark, great post. it's a shame she wasn't wearing the button 'ironically.' ie. a la Sarah Silverman.

that kind of thing is lost on the bougy lib.

:-)

Anonymous said...

You've been analyzed!

http://proteinwisdom.com/?p=11134

Don said...

it is a testament to mark's fitness that i was totally unaware of any of this exchange, and needed to have it repeated back to me soon afterwards. mark kicked my butt yesterday. it was athletically impressive.

it is also worthwhile to mention that not many people have the skills, let alone the patience, to indulge me in a comparative analysis of biomechanical philosophies. it was academically impressive.

megA said...

but my dear mark, so many african americans can "pass" for white and thus identity and "looks" can become confusing. as i elevated my legs this weekend, i watched part two of henry louis gates special on pbs where he traces the ancestry of famous african americans. one woman who "appeared" white was in fact 20% african, and thus had more black ancestry in her than I believe gates has himself, but she identifies white and he identifies black.

you know racial identity is one of my favs to discuss and ponder. we should really hang out more. you should really read black no more. better yet--you and don read it, then you can ask him questions about it when you are kicking his ass and he'll have to come up with an answer and thus forget the pain in his legs. . .

xo
m

Mark said...

Meg,

That was exactly my discomfort with this whole thing... one which I tried to articulate.

The whole exchange is predicated upon a reading of this woman's race and belief that that somehow authenticates her wearing the button.

But what do I know?

Adam said...

dude, I just have to say, upon the first reading, I thought the girl in your story with the button was going to wind up saying that she was African. do they have accents?

anyway, I sent your post to Jeff because, well, I dig some of Jeff's stuff, and I thought he might appreciate your story. you were riffing off something similar I've read of his. and well, appreciate he did! :-)

I hope this hasn't inconvenienced or offended you in any way. and I dig your follow up post.

cheers.

Mark said...

Adam,

No offense at all. It was a little disorienting to see the writing that I do as a warm up over my morning oatmeal subjected to analysis in the way that my professional writing is, but, as I am fond of saying, we can't control where it goes or how it's received once it goes out.

Mandy said...

niiiice. on a much more trivial note:
reminds me of www.stuffwhitepeoplelike.wordpress.com
i think the bougy would identify